Hey y’all!
Sorry I disappeared again. My brother Bill took ill right after Christmas, and he spent 49 days in the hospital. As many of you
know, Bill is autistic and non-verbal. My sister and I are his co-guardians.
So, we pretty much spent 49 days at the hospital making sure he received the
best care and was as comfortable as possible.
I’m happy to say Bill is out and on the mend. We’ve got a long
road ahead, but we’ve found the right path ahead.
I’ll have more to say about some key lessons learned through
Bill’s unexpected hospitalization as soon as my nerves settle down.
Whew.
Anyway … hello!
Today is election day in St. Louis city, Missouri.
Yay!
Longtime readers know that I absolutely adore voting.
It’s cold as hell outside, so I won’t be able to walk to my
polling spot … and I have to vote in a Catholic elementary school auditorium,
which means I’ll be walking by pictures of church leaders currently knee-deep
in rape, molestation, and cover-up scandals … *shudder* ... but I’m still excited to get my
vote on.
That's probably why I woke up thinking about politics, and calls for folk to be realistic and patient.
As folk gear up for the looming 2020 political battles, I’ve
noticed a theme of pundits and reporters pitting bold progressive policy against moderate “realistic” proposals. They usually frame it as risky versus safe.
Here’s my take on why that’s bullshit.
When pundits and reporters pit progressive policy against
what they deem realistic, they are building off a foundation that assumes primary
candidates will have to pivot their campaigns to fight over the same gaggle of
independent/undecided voters in the general.
I get it.
I just don’t agree.
I used to think campaigns leaned into the moderate-for-the-general campaign strategy because it was the most efficient way to thread the needle, but I’ve grown
to understand that all too often the candidates are actually moderate as hell within their party's framework … and thus eager as hell to make that
pivot once they survive the primary.
Add in the fact that most people moving up the political power ladder are pushed up by various interests, they spend way too much time in a bubble obsessed with maintaining power to satisfy those interests, and that will produce a moderate every single time.
But that's the result of the system currently producing most candidates, not what the masses want or need.
I learned so much watching organizers work
the hell out of the primary campaign that helped defeat 20+year incumbent Democratic county prosecutor Bob McCullough in St. Louis county.
We can continue to exclusively fight for the same pod of undecided voters … or we can go bold, throw the net out wider,
and speak to people who feel the ebb and flow of policy on a daily basis and
thus are passionate as hell about change even if they don’t have faith that the candidates we've historically run can make it happen.
And the best part of the win is that the voters
who made it possible have a realistic expectation of what comes after the
election. I know they do, because I’ve had the privilege of talking to several voters
touched by organizers last year who have schooled me on what to expect going forward.
Fantabulous work.
If we want to see more of that, we need to support organizations like Action St. Louis. It also means that we're going to have to lean into the current tension between moderates and progressives.
It’s important to question whether the people sparking fear
over progressive policy proposals have something to gain beyond winning office from a
moderate approach.
Do they benefit from the status quo? How?
Do they have donors and backers who benefit from slowing things down, stalling change, or hitting pause so that [insert great idea here] remains a bright shiny object that people keep chasing but can never seem to catch?
Is their privilege threatened by your liberation?
Do they think that it is?
Have you seen them in your ‘hood or at a community event when they aren't running for office or supporting someone running for office?
Blink.
In conclusion ...
Every single right I have was earned through protest, direct-action,
and the courage of my ancestors to look moderates in the eye and then hip-check them
out of the way.
I know that the impossible is possible.
And now I'm off to vote ...
